While walking my dog daily, most passer by will say… The moment I saw your dogs, I know I will definitely see you, that is love showing a relative comparison between myself and my dogs.

Our modern world is becoming unbecoming as most old folks would say, but I will rather say it is becoming simpler to live in, for example; Kylie Jenner now look more prettier is a baggy Jean than she would look in an average feminine clothing; Gabrielle Union now and of course before now look more appealing in a man’s suite – worn by the men of the eighties. Let stop beating around the bush and get to the point.

Love and religion has promoted the concept of hermaphrodism than any other. Love leads to marriage, marriage says one flesh has become one, this if we follow the genetic breeding law means the man is now mixed with the woman and verse versa both now have two chromosome in one body… That if we need to explain scientifically is the process of hermaphrodism which is defined as an organism having two features of both sexes.

Another point is the Biagender God, which the LGBT say occur in mythologies and religious narratives that include stories of romantic affection or sexuality between figures of the same sex or that feature divine actions that result in changes in gender. These myths are considered by some modern queer scholars to be forms of lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) expression, and modern conceptions of sexuality and gender have been retroactively applied to them.

Taxonomy is a human construction that is affirmed in the biblical creation story, ” After the LORD God formed from the ground every wild animal and every bird that flies, he brought each of them to the man to see what he would call it. Whatever the man called each living creature became its name. The man gave names to all the livestock, to the birds that fly, and to each of earth’s animals,” Gen 2:19-20a.

Also “man” was not called “man” (ish) until there was woman (isha). So all the references to that point are about “adam,” presumbly, “made from mud” being. The taxonomy started with adam, and affirmed by God, began progressively in that it began with adam naming the animals and then into “ordering” of humankind in order to distinguish roles necessary for function in daily lives.

Who is to say that God ever intended for the taxonomy to be fixed? It is still ongoing and progressive. When I was is high school (64-69) there were two Kingdoms. Now there are five. To say that gender is fixed would mean that humans have stopped learning about humans – which we haven’t.

A comment from Jimmy on an article Being they: God and nonbinary gender is stated below:

He said;

Having a fixed taxonomy (even of the heavenly bodies) would be a product of the hubris of believing one knows everything there is to know about something, which is the original sin, for to desire to eat of the knowledge of good and evil partly means to desire to know everything about the universe, or anything else for that matter.

One argument states, “God made them male and female.” But God still gave adam the authority to delineate among beings based on observed characteristics. Thank God our observations have become more keen, even as they are built on the observations, and needs, of the past. Plus, as you stated we could assign the gender “divine” to our description of God and note its infinity of characteristics.

As a student who once took some classes biology and microbiology, I would love to support the above statement.

The discussion on gender is very broad and I’m sure God is very definite not to really put a stop to a certain mention, for example we could wake up some day and find out there are more heterogeneous species out there in other planet, who knows.

Another interesting story is the one being told by Jessi Hempel on his brother’s experience of child birth tittled “The Christian Response to Gender Dysphoria”.

First and foremost, I am writing this article to inform Christians that every being is a bearer of God and we just have love them regardless of whatever they choose to do.

If God made men and women fundamentally and comprehensively different, then the idea that a man could ever become a woman (or vice versa) is simply impossible. The differences between men and women can’t be overcome simply because one person feels they’re a member of the opposite sex. Your psychology (feelings) cannot change your ontology (being).

This means a man could decided to be a woman but that doesn’t necessarily change his ontology, though his psychology which bring about the feelings in his physical body may change his thinking of who he is, but his ontology will never change.

Temi Badmus